Carl Straumsheim has an interesting piece over at InsideHigherEd.com about Blackboards newest release “Ultra” and its strategy to support its legacy app as well. The real question comes down to wether or not Blackboard can transition to the cloud and still support non-cloud hosted versions. He quotes Glenda Morgan, a research at Gartner that specializes in educational technology. She said blackboard “is trying to do too many things and not disappoint many people.” She continued:
Down the road that means a fragmented and unsustainable model. . . . They need to figure out what the strategy is and just be really clear about it, and then if they end up changing it, be really hones about it.
The article provides a good overview of the growth of Instructure’s Canvas product and Blackboard attempt to upgrade itself and move past some missteps in recent years.
The full article is here: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/04/25/analysts-colleges-question-blackboards-all-above-strategy
Blackboard recently posted to its blog about how successful students use LMS tools that are available to them. The interesting part of their study is the most consistent predictor of student success. According to John Whitmer:
The most consistent predictor of student achievement was how frequently a student looked at their grades; this surprised me given that other tools (like assessments) directly and tangibly influence a student’s grade. This is an independent behavioral measure and yet is a very strong predictor.
The most successful students are those who access MyGrades most frequently; students doing poorly do not access their grades. Students who never access their grades are more likely to fail than students who access them at least once. There is a direct relationship at every quartile of use – and at the risk of spoiling results for the other tools, this is the only tool for which this direct trend exists. It appears that students in the middle range of grades aren’t impacted by their use of the tool.
This finding suggests that to change student outcomes, we need to use proactive intervention strategies. Examples include grade notifications within the Activity stream of Blackboard Learn with the Ultra experience, or the alerts provided by Blackboard Predict.
When Bill Ballhaus took over the helm at Blackboard many were openly willing to give him some advice. Michael Feldstein said Blackboard was facing issues with customers who were “increasingly unhappy with the support they are getting on the current platform,” who were “unclear about how they will be affected by future development plans,” and who are “unconvinced that Blackboard will deliver a next-generation product in the near future that will be a compelling alternative to the competitors in the market.” While Joshua Kim at Inside Higher Ed said he should “bet the company on analytics.”
Now Campus Technology has set down with Ballhaus for an interview. The interview is available here.
Lou Pugliese, Founding CEO of Blackboard and currently Chairman and CEO of Moodlerooms, recently published an article at EDUCAUSE.edu on the future of the Learning Management System (LMS). The article is about LMS 3.0 or the Demand Design LMS. This represents the move from avendor supply-side orientation to a user demand-side focus. As Pugliese puts it:
In an LMS 3.0 world, driving more effective, pervasive, and consistent academic achievement will be accomplished by transforming LMS platforms into learning solutions ecosystems. In this new LMS environment, a faculty member is a learning architect (the future) as opposed to a learning manager (the present). The LMS 3.0 world will adapt to the art of teaching as opposed to faculty having to adapt to a particular technology. Content used for enrichment as well as remediation can be subscribed and syndicated to student learning profiles in ways we cannot accomplish today. In the new LMS world, institutions will be able to shape the component architecture to the individual needs of the program, course, or learner. The new LMS world will flip the traditional equation, transforming the LMS from a vendor supply-side orientation to a user demand-side focus.
Pugliese writes that the LMS 3.0 would have several “essential components” including:
- Learning Grids: “organized communities in specific subject and learning objective groups that encourage creation, sharing, and interdependencies”
- E-Learning Intelligence: “LMS 3.0 design transforms static data reporting into a learning transaction system, transitioning from a management system to a source for real-time data about academic activity, student behavior, and engagement.”
- Content Clouds: “LMS 3.0 design expands functionality to include open, flexible digital repositories with components that add context through outcomes measurement, social curation, reporting, analytics, and extensive sharing capabilities.”
- Open Architecture: “LMS 3.0 is built on a foundation of openness. In a world where “open” is a term that of late has been used with wide creative license, LMS open architecture is built with and broadly supports widely usable interoperability protocols and standards, open-source applications, open identification, and open digital rights.”
Pugliese provides an interesting look at the future of the LMS from someone who has been deeply involved in it from the start.
The full article is available here.
Katie Blot, senior vice president for corporate strategy and business development at Blackboard, announced on the Blackboard blog that Bill Ballhaus was replacing Jay Bhatt as CEO. She wrote:
Today, we are fortunate to be joined by a great leader – our new CEO Bill Ballhaus. Bill’s philosophy is directly in line with ours and his skill set is going to help us reach new heights. While this is certainly a change for Blackboard, rest assured that the heart of our mission and strategy will remain the same. . . .
So we have defined our strategy and now, with Bill joining the company, we’ll continue to execute against it. Bill has accomplished much over his career and his operational expertise has led various businesses to great success. He and I share a fundamental belief that if you make your first priority taking care of your customers, the business results will follow. So, under his leadership Blackboard will continue our focus on doing just that. We will deliver next generation teaching and learning capabilities to the market, continue our international growth, and improve even further the way we serve our customers and strive to exceed their expectations. Bill is uniquely positioned to help us execute against these priorities, and with him we’ll achieve significant advances for our customers and for Blackboard.
Here are some early comments:
Google is developing Google Classroom as a learning management system to it Apps for Education space.
The following tools have been added:
- Assignments that integrate with Google Drive and Google Docs;
- Real-time feedback on student work;
- Assignment sheets;
- Real-time questions;
- Commenting; and
- Homework collection and organization.
When teachers open the classroom app they see cards with their classes on them. They can then click on the cards to manage the classes, grade assignments, etc.
More information is available here @ CampusTechnology.com (http://campustechnology.com/articles/2014/05/06/google-developing-free-lms-as-part-of-apps-for-education.aspx)
LearnDash.com has an article about a 2012 survey on the penetration of learning management systems into the marketplace. According to them Blackboard still rules with 74%, with Moodle being its closest competitor @42%. Desire2Learn is a distant third with 14%. [Please note that because schools have multiple LMSs, the numbers do not add up to 100%.]
On November 6, 2013 from 1-2:00 PM EST, Casey Green–senior research consultant for Inside Higher Ed and founding director of The Campus Computing Project–will look at the process by which UW moved from three disjointed systems to selecting Canvas by Instructure as it only institutional LMS after a year long pilot.